Select Page
How much do pipes rust in a year?

How much do pipes rust in a year?

Why is corrosion important?

According to the Association of Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP) the total estimated annual cost of corrosion is as high as 3.5% of a country’s GDP [1]. An AMPP international study [2] found that in the United States alone, the corrosion related cost can be as high as $1.4 billion USD annually in the oil and gas exploration and production sector. This figure climbs even higher, up to $40 billion USD for gas and drinking water distribution plus sewer systems. This is an unavoidable problem with a high cost to bear.

Even though the corrosion itself isn’t unavoidable, it can be controlled by using the right material in the right place. Using a reliable test method that evaluates the material’s resistance against corrosion and predicts its potential failure is of the utmost importance. This test method should also be cost-effective and practicable.

What is corrosion?

Corrosion refers to a naturally occurring process that involves the deterioration or degradation of metals and alloys through a chemical reaction. The corrosion rate is highly dependent on the type of material, ambient temperature, contaminants/impurities, and other environmental factors. Most corrosion phenomena are electrochemical in nature and consist of at least two reactions on the surface of the metals or alloys.

For example:

These electrochemical process require three main elements:

  • Anode: where the metal corrosion occurs.
  • Cathode: the electrical conductor, which is not consumed during the corrosion process in the real-life electrochemical cell configuration.
  • Electrolyte: the corrosive medium that enables the transfer of electrons between the anode and the cathode.

Depending on the materials and environment, corrosion can occur in different ways, such as uniform corrosion, pitting corrosion, crevice corrosion, galvanic corrosion, or microbiologically induced corrosion to name just a few. Learn more about the different types of corrosion in our free white paper.

This white paper also includes details about relevant electrochemical techniques including Linear Sweep Voltammetry (LSV), Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS), and Electrochemical Noise (ECN or ZRA). These techniques allow for the exploration of corrosion mechanisms, the behavior of different materials, the rate at which corrosion occurs, and also to determine the suitability of the corrosion protection solutions such as protective coatings and inhibitors, among others.

Find out more about these subjects individually with our selection of free Application Notes (AN).
Calculation of corrosion parameters with NOVA – Tafel plot corresponding to corrosion behavior of iron in seawater. (Click to enlarge)

Creating pipe-flow conditions in your corrosion laboratory

Internal corrosion is the most problematic cause of pipeline failure. To understand the fundamentals about corrosion failure and its root causes within pipelines, a similar environment should be created in the lab.

The Rotating Cylinder Electrode (RCE) is an integral part of creating hydrodynamic electrochemical experiments in the lab that create turbulent flow conditions which realistically simulate the situation for liquids flowing through pipes. The RCE can be used with most electrochemical techniques such as chronoamperometry, chronopotentiometry, and potential sweep.

Study of the corrosion rate as a function of rotation speed (convective flux) is one of the most common applications for the RCE. Corrosion studies can be performed using linear or cyclic polarization measurements (LP, DPD, CP), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and electrochemical noise (ECN) with respect to the rotation speed.

Results obtained by electrochemical methods are more accurate and are obtained much faster than conventional corrosion investigation methods (e.g. salt spray), providing more efficiency and productivity to any corrosion measurement laboratory. Learn about the RCE and how to simulate realistic pipe-flow conditions in the lab combined with electrochemical corrosion techniques in our free white paper.

One typical method in electrochemical corrosion studies is linear polarization (LP). With this method, it is possible to evaluate the corrosion behavior of a sample under pipe-flow (i.e. turbulent flow) conditions and learn about the corrosion rate of the sample at a specific flow rate.

Metrohm offers two Application Notes that use this technique specifically:

The Tafel plot obtained from LP measurement gives an indication of the corrosion potential. Using dedicated analysis tools in the NOVA software from Metrohm Autolab, the corrosion rate analysis can be performed and corrosion rate can be calculated, giving an indication of how much the pipe will rust in a year (in mm/year) under given conditions. Once this information is available for a certain material, a more corrosion resistive environment can be developed by applying a certain coating or a corrosion inhibitor.

Tafel plot created by Metrohm Autolab’s NOVA software. Blue line is measured without corrosion inhibitor and red line is measured with corrosion inhibitor.
Tafel plot created by Metrohm Autolab’s NOVA software corresponding to the measurements done in quiescent electrolyte (blue) and under 500 RPM rotation rate (red). All other experimental parameters were kept the same.

A second evaluation can be performed to learn how much the pipe will rust in a year, under these resistive conditions. In the example below, under standard conditions, the corrosion rate of carbon steel is measured at 0.25 mm/yr. However, when a specific corrosion inhibitor is used (tryptamine in this case), the performance is significantly improved and the corrosion rate drops to 0.065 mm/yr. These results can be achieved in a matter of minutes by using electrochemical methods, whereas by conventional methods (e.g., salt spray chamber combined with weight loss analysis), it takes up to a few months to conclude the results. That is a huge difference in efficiency!

Corrosion Parameter No Inhibitor With Inhibitor
Ecorr (V) from linear regression -0.479 -0.392
Ecorr (V) from Tafel analysis -0.482 -0.396
Rp (Ω) from linear regression 42.62 135.96
Rp (Ω) from Tafel analysis 43.32 136.39
Corrosion rate (mm/year) from Tafel analysis 0.25 0.065
Linear regression and Tafel analysis data resulting from experiments with and without corrosion inhibitor.


Understanding the corrosion behavior of a material under real-life conditions helps manufacturers to more quickly optimize the material design in terms of corrosion resistance, either by using a more suitable material for the pipes or by using adequate corrosion protection methods (i.e., coatings or corrosion inhibitors), which results in significant cost savings and safer operation.

Post written by Dr. Reza Fathi, Product Specialist at Metrohm Autolab, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Unmatched flexibility in online ion analysis: The 2060 IC Process Analyzer

Unmatched flexibility in online ion analysis: The 2060 IC Process Analyzer

When discussing chemical analysis, the first thing that comes to mind is a chemist working in the laboratory analyzing a sample.

However, in the industrial process world chemical analysis is a much more complicated affair. In the metalworking industry for example, corrosion is a complex problem. The conventional approach (offline analysis systems) is costly, and a more proactive approach is needed for prevention, identification, and manufacturing of high quality metalworking products. Therefore, a more comprehensive sample monitoring and analysis approach is necessary in order to comply with such requirements.

While offline analysis systems depend upon an analyst to collect and process samples, an online analysis system allows for continuous monitoring of multiple parameters in real time without being dependent on an analyst.

Need to refresh your knowledge about the differences between online, inline, and atline analysis? Read our blog post: «We are pioneers: Metrohm Process Analytics».

The implementation of Process Analytical Technologies (PAT) provides a detailed representation in real time of the actual conditions within a process. As a complete solution provider, Metrohm Process Analytics offers the best solutions for online chemical analysis. We seek to optimize process analysis by developing flexible, modular process analyzers that allow multiple analyses of different analytes from a representative sample taken directly at the process site.

Want to learn more about PAT? Check out our article series here: «To automate or not to automate? Advantages of PAT – Part 1».

2060 IC Process Analyzer

With more than 40 years of experience with online process analysis, Metrohm Process Analytics has always been committed to innovation. In 2001, the first modular IC system was developed at Metrohm and it was a success. In the past several years Metrohm Process Analytics focused on implementing more modular flexibility in their products, which resulted in the introduction of the next generation of Process Ion Chromatographs: the 2060 IC Process Analyzer (Figure 1) in 2019. It is built using two 930 Compact IC Flex systems and is in full synergy with the Metrohm process analyzer portfolio (such as the 2060 Process Analyzer).

Figure 1. The 2060 IC Process Analyzer from Metrohm Process Analytics. Pictured here is the touchscreen human interface, the analytical wet part (featuring additional sample preparation modules – top inlay, and the integrated IC – bottom inlay), and a reagent cabinet.

For more background behind the development of IC solutions for the process world, check out our previous blog posts featuring the past of the 2060 IC Process Analyzer:

Using the 2060 platform, modularity is taken to the next step. Configurations of up to four wet part cabinets allow numerous combinations of multiple analysis modules for multiparameter measurements on multiple process streams, making this analyzer unequal to any other on the market.

This modular architecture gives the additional possibility to place separate cabinets in different locations around a production site for a wide angle view of the process. For example, the 2060 IC Process Analyzer can be set up at different locations to prevent corrosion on the water steam cycles in fossil and nuclear power plants.

The 2060 IC Process Analyzer is managed using flexible software enabling straightforward efficient control and programming options. With multiple types of detectors available from Metrohm, high precision analysis of a wide spectrum of analytes is possible in parallel.

The inclusion of an optional (pressureless) ultrapure water system for autonomous operation and reliable trace analysis also benefits users by providing continuous eluent production possibilities for unattended operation (Figure 2).

Finally, the well-known Metrohm Inline Sample Preparation (MISP) techniques are an added bonus for process engineers for repeatable, fully automated preparation of challenging sample matrices.

Figure 2. Continuous eluent production integrated in the 2060 IC Process Analyzer.

Top applications

The collection of samples and process data, including corrosion prevention and control indicators, is critical for efficient plant management in many industries. In order to prevent unscheduled plant shutdowns, accidents, and damage to company assets, process engineers rely on their colleagues in the lab to pinpoint corrosion problems. One of the most effective ways to bridge laboratory analyses to the process environment is to employ real-time analysis monitoring.

Figure 3. Product and process optimization differences between offline, atline, online, and inline analysis.

Optimal online corrosion management

Be it quantifying the harmful corrosive ions (e.g., chlorides, sulfates, or organic acids), measuring corrosion inhibitors (e.g., ammonia, amines, and film-forming amines), or detecting corrosion products, the 2060 IC Process Analyzer is the ideal solution for 24/7 unattended analysis.

In a nuclear power plant, this analyzer can measure a number of analytes including inorganic anions, organic cations, and aliphatic amines to ensure a thorough understanding of corrosive indications without needing multiple instruments.

Figure 4. Water sample from the primary circuit of a pressurized water reactor containing 2 g/L H3BO3 and 3.3 mg/L LiOH spiked with 2 μg/L anions (preconcentration volume: 2000 μL).
Figure 5. Simulated sample from the primary circuit of a pressurized water reactor containing 2 g/L H3BO3 and 3.3 mg/L LiOH spiked with 2 μg/L nickel, zinc, calcium, and magnesium (preconcentration volume: 1000 μL).

Providing quick, reliable results, this system gives valuable insight into the status of corrosion processes within a plant by continuous comparison of results with control values. By correlating the results with specific events, effective corrective action can quickly be undertaken to prevent or minimize plant downtime.

For more information about the determination of anions and cations in the primary circuit of nuclear power plants with the 2060 IC Process Analyzer, download our free Application Notes below.

Online drinking water analysis

In drinking water plants and beverage bottling companies, determination of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) like bromate is crucial due to their carcinogenic properties. The carcinogen bromate (BrO3) has a recommended concentration limit of 10 μg/L of in drinking water set by the World Health Organization.

Nowadays, ion chromatography has been proven to be the best routine analysis method for water analysis, due to its possibility of automated sample preparation, various separation mechanisms, and different types of detectors. Some of the analytical standards that support this include: EPA 300.1EPA 321.8, ASTM D6581, ISO 11206, and ISO 15061.

The 2060 IC Process Analyzer can monitor trace levels of bromate in drinking water online, meaning higher throughput, less time spent performing manual laboratory tests, and better quality drinking water.

Figure 6. Drinking water sample, spiked with 10 μg/L each of chlorite, bromate, chlorate, 40 μg/L each of nitrate, bromide, 100 μg/L phosphate, and 500 μg/L dichloroacetate.
Figure 7. Analysis of a mineral water sample spiked with 0.5 μg/L bromate.

To learn more about the online analysis of bromate in drinking water with the 2060 IC Process Analyzer, download our free Application Note.

Monitoring aerosols and gases in air

Approximately 92% of the world population lives in places where the World Health Organization air quality guideline levels are not met. Air pollution can exacerbate preexisting health conditions and shorten lifespans. It has even been suggested as a link to infertility causes. Hence, understanding the impact of air pollution and air constituents on the environment and our wellbeing is of great significance.

Air pollution is caused not only by gaseous compounds, but also by aerosols and particulate matter (PM). These extremely fine particles enter and damage the lungs; from them, ultrafine particles can spread across the body through the blood cells and cause symptoms of inflammation. While these risks are being debated and researched actively around the world, it is still not known which compounds actually cause harm.

As a result, there is a great need for more specific data on long-term measurements. Fast analytical methods and real-time measurements of concentrations of chemical compounds in ambient air are important and should make it possible to better understand the circumstances and effects.

For optimal air quality monitoring, the gas and aerosol composition of the surrounding air has to be analyzed practically simultaneously as well as continuously, which is possible via inline analysis with ion chromatography.

Metrohm Process Analytics offers the 2060 MARGA (Monitor for AeRosols and Gases in ambient Air) which thanks to its dual-channel ion chromatograph, can automatically analyze the ions from the collected gas and aerosol samples.

If you want to learn more background behind the development of the 2060 MARGA, check out our previous blog post: History of Metrohm IC – Part 5.

For a full list of free downloadable 2060 IC applications, visit our website and check out the Metrohm Application Finder!

Free Application Notes

For the 2060 IC Process Analyzer

Post written by Andrea Ferreira, Technical Writer at Metrohm Applikon, Schiedam, The Netherlands.

ASTM D6304: Easier determination of moisture in petroleum products

ASTM D6304: Easier determination of moisture in petroleum products

Water in petroleum products, such as lubricating oils, jet fuel, or other similar products can have deleterious effects. Moisture is often associated with corrosion and engine wear. Knowing the water content of petroleum products can prevent damage to costly infrastructure and ensure safer operations.

ASTM D6304 «Standard Test Method for Determination of Water in Petroleum Products, Lubricating Oils, and Additives by Coulometric Karl Fischer Titration» is a standard that is often cited for moisture determination in the specifications of various petroleum products. It has been recently updated (January 2021) and now offers three procedures for accurate moisture determination.

The direct sample injection into the titration cell (Procedure A) is recommended for low viscosity samples without expected interferences. An oven (Procedure B) or water evaporator accessory (Procedure C) can be used to analyze samples that do not readily dissolve in Karl Fischer reagent, viscous samples, and samples with components that are expected to interfere with the Karl Fischer reaction.

In this blog post I want to introduce these three procedures, and then discuss when it is appropriate to use each of them.

Determining the moisture content in petroleum products doesn’t have to be messy. Visit our website to learn more about the new automated measurement capabilities allowed with ASTM D6304.

A coulometric Karl Fischer Titrator such as the 851 Titrando from Metrohm is the basis for all three procedures of ASTM D6304.

Direct injection (Procedure A)

The direct sample injection into the titration cell is recommended for low viscosity samples without expected interferences. An aliquot of known mass or volume is injected into the conditioned titration cell of a coulometric Karl Fischer apparatus, where it is titrated automatically, and the results calculated.

Method D6304 permits the use of coulometric generator electrodes with and without diaphragm. We recommend the use of the generator electrode with diaphragm, due to the low water content of the samples.

Not all petroleum products are soluble in Karl Fischer reagent and phase separation can occur when using Procedure A. If phase separation occurs, the reagents need to be replaced. The number of samples which can be analyzed without phase separation depends on the volume and type of sample, the volume of reagent, and the sample solubility in the reagent.

The generator electrode with diaphragm is recommended for water determination according to ASTM D6304 Procedure A.

However, for these kinds of samples, Procedures B or C are often the better solution. The same is the case if your sample contains interfering substances.

For more information about ASTM D6304 Procedure A, download our free Application Bulletin (AB-209). For more tips and tricks about how to improve your Karl Fischer titration, have a look at our blog series: «Frequently asked questions in Karl Fischer titration».

Water extraction using an oven (Procedure B)

An oven (Procedure B) can be used to analyze samples that do not readily dissolve in Karl Fischer reagent, viscous samples, and samples with components that are expected to interfere with the Karl Fischer reaction.

For the analysis, a representative sample is weighed into a glass vial, which is sealed immediately. The vial is then heated in an oven to extract any water. The vaporized water is carried into the conditioned Karl Fischer titration cell by means of a dry carrier gas where it is titrated.

Schematic drawing of the Karl Fischer oven method.

The ideal temperature used for the evaporation depends on the sample. The 874 Oven Sample Processor can perform a temperature gradient test to determine the optimal temperature for removing water without degrading the sample.

To learn more about the oven method, its working principle and its advantages, check out our blog post: «Oven method for sample preparation in Karl Fischer titration».

Watch our LabCast video below to see the working principle and advantages of using Procedure B.

For more information about using the KF oven method for ASTM D6304 Procedure B, download our free Application Bulletin (AB-209) or free Application Note (AN-K-070).

Just want the highlights? Have a look at our short flyer about how ASTM D6304 has become much easier!

Water extraction using an evaporator (Procedure C)

Instead of using an oven, Procedure C explains how a water evaporator can be used for the water extraction of samples that do not readily dissolve in Karl Fischer reagent, viscous samples, and samples with components that are expected to interfere with the Karl Fischer reaction.

In this procedure, an aliquot of sample is transferred into a heated chamber containing a suitable solvent (most often, toluene). The temperature of the heated chamber depends on the solvent used. The water vaporizes along with the solvent in an azeotrope distillation. The azeotrope is then transferred into the conditioned Karl Fischer titration cell via a dry non-reactive carrier gas. 

Schematic drawing of the evaporator method.

If you wish to read more about the three procedures and their advantages and disadvantages, download our White Paper: «Moisture in petroleum products according to ASTM D6304».

When to use which procedure

Procedure A is mainly suited for liquid samples with a low viscosity, such as diesel fuel, jet fuel, or aromatics. A low viscosity is required in order to be able to add the sample easily into the Karl Fischer titration cell. Furthermore, the samples require a good solubility in Karl Fischer reagent. Otherwise phase separation will occur, which requires the replacement of the Karl Fischer reagents. While the reagent exchange can be automated, time is still required until the reagents reach dryness again.

Even if samples are soluble in Karl Fischer reagents, there might still be issues with using Procedure A due to the sample matrix creating side reactions and thus false results. In this case Procedure B or C are the better option.

Procedure B is suitable for all kinds of samples, regardless of their viscosity or matrix composition. It is only the evaporated water that is transferred into the titration cell, leaving the sample as well as interfering matrix components remaining in the sealed vial, which can be simply disposed of after the analysis. For this reason, the reagent exchange frequency is greatly reduced, saving costs, as less reagent is required. Depending on the workload in your lab, it is even possible to fully automate the analysis including reagent exchange using an automated Karl Fischer oven.

The 874 Karl Fischer Oven Processor with an 851 Titrando for a fully automated analysis according to ASTM D6304 Procedure B.

Procedure C, like Procedure B, is suitable for all kinds of samples, regardless of their viscosity or matrix constitution. It is only the evaporated water in an azeotrope with the solvent that is transferred into the titration cell. The sample, as well as interfering matrix components, remain in the evaporation chamber. However, it is necessary to manually empty and refill the evaporation chamber from time to time, which is time consuming, as the chamber needs to cool down before the content can be exchanged. Furthermore, walk-away automation is not possible with this method.

For a more detailed comparison of the various factors for each procedure, download our free White Paper: «Moisture in petroleum products according to ASTM D6304».

Visit our website

Save time with the new automated measurement capabilities allowed with ASTM D6304

Post written by Lucia Meier, Technical Editor at Metrohm International Headquarters, Herisau, Switzerland.

Fast determination of acid and base number by thermometric titration

Fast determination of acid and base number by thermometric titration

Acid number (AN) and base number (BN) are critical parameters in the quality control of petroleum products as they are often stipulated by product specifications. Traditionally both parameters can be determined by potentiometric or photometric titration according to various standards such as ASTM D664 (Standard Test Method for Acid Number of Petroleum Products by Potentiometric Titration), ASTM D2896 (Standard Test Method for Base Number of Petroleum Products by Potentiometric Perchloric Acid Titration), or ASTM D974 (Standard Test Method for Acid and Base Number by Color-Indicator Titration). However, there is a rapid and reliable alternative titration method – thermometric titration.

Why determine the acid and base number?

The acid number is an indication for the amount of acids present in petroleum products. Weak acids present in crude oils (e.g. naphthenic acid) can be linked to corrosion of refinery equipment. For petroleum products, aging can lead to the buildup of acids, which increases the risk of corrosion to pipes and holding tanks.

To prevent such an acidic buildup, basic additives are added to refined petroleum products, such as lubricating oil. These basic additives neutralize the weak acids and can prevent corrosion. The amount of basic additives can be characterized using the base number.

What is thermometric titration?

Thermometric titration (TET) is based on the principle of enthalpy change. Each chemical reaction is associated with a change in enthalpy that in turn causes a temperature change. This temperature change during a titration can be measured with a highly sensitive thermistor (Figure 1) in order to determine the endpoint of the titration.

Figure 1. Metrohm’s maintenance-free Thermoprobe used for fast and reliable indication of thermometric titration endpoints.

If you would like to read more about the basic principles of thermometric titration, click below for our previous  blog post «Thermometric titration – the missing piece of the puzzle».

TET: the best choice for AN and BN determination

If you’ve performed a potentiometric titration of the acid and base number, you probably know that not all samples are soluble in the solvent mixture. Even if they are soluble, several cleaning steps (including conditioning of the electrode after each titration) are necessary in order to achieve good reproducibility.

While photometric titration provides an alternative indication method for samples which are not colored, the solubility issue remains. Thermometric titration of the AN according to ASTM D8045 provides the ideal solution to all of these issues.

  • The xylene/IPA (3/1) solution allows better solubility of many samples, especially crude oils
  • Endpoint indication is not affected by colored samples
  • The Thermoprobe requires no conditioning or additional cleaning steps – only a rinse with solvent
  • The Thermoprobe is maintenance-free – no electrolyte refilling necessary, just store it dry

There are even more benefits if compared to the potentiometric titration according to ASTM D664 or ASTM D2896.


  • Less solvent used: 30 mL instead of 60 mL or 120 mL saves additional costs and reduces waste
  • Faster titrations: half the time of potentiometric titrations, saving about 2 minutes per analysis
  • Robust sensor: the Thermoprobe is completely maintenance-free and needs no conditioning, further reducing analysis time.

For a comprehensive comparison between the AN determination according to ASTM D8045 (thermometric titration) and ASTM D664 (potentiometric titration), check out Table 1 below. While the titrant and solvent mixtures differ if you perform a base number determination, the values for solvent volume, titration time, electrode conditioning, and sensor maintenance reflect the comparison between thermometric base number determination and potentiometric determination according to ASTM D2896 very well. Discussions for an ASTM standard on thermometric BN determinations are currently ongoing within the respective committee.

Table 1. Comparison between ASTM D664 and ASTM D8045 concerning various parameters.

Since you are titrating faster, using less solvent, and do not have to perform complicated sensor maintenance, you can save quite a bit of money by switching to thermometric titration.

Not convinced yet? Then listen to one of our customers, Thomas Fischer from Oel Check GmbH, Germany, about his positive experiences with Metrohm thermometric titration.

«Thermometric titration has several advantages compared to potentiometric titration. It is much faster and more robust. A typical thermometric titration takes just about 2 minutes. Moreover, the electrode does not need to be regenerated between determinations.»

Thomas Fischer

Laboratory Manager, Oel Check GmBH

Additionally, I suggest downloading our related white paper on this topic: «Avoid corrosion: A new method for TAN determination in crude oil and petroleum products», which contains comparison data between ASTM D664 and ASTM D8045.

How to perform the analysis

During the AN or BN determination, very weak acids or bases (respectively) are titrated, resulting in small enthalpy changes. By using a catalytic endpoint indicator, these weak acids and bases can also be determined by TET.

What is catalyzed endpoint indication?

Endpoint indication becomes difficult for titrations with small enthalpy changes, such as with weak acids or bases. In these situations, a catalytic endpoint indicator is used. The catalytic endpoint indicator undergoes a strongly exothermic or endothermic reaction during the titration. As with an indicator which changes color when all analyte has been titrated, the catalytic endpoint indicator only starts its reaction with the titrant after all analyte has been consumed. In this way, the indication of the endpoint becomes possible.

Figure 2. Thermometric titration system consisting of a 859 Titrotherm fully equipped with a Thermoprobe, titration stand and buret, and the tiamo software for the TAN or TBN determination.

Acid number

An appropriate amount of the sample (depending on the expected AN) is weighed into the titration vessel, then 30 mL solvent mixture (isopropanol:xylene 1:3) and 0.5 g paraformaldehyde are added. After dissolution of the sample, the solution is then titrated with alcoholic KOH to a single exothermic endpoint.

Here, the paraformaldehyde acts as the catalytic endpoint indicator. As soon as there is an excess of KOH available it will de-polymerize in a strongly endothermic reaction, resulting in an exothermic endpoint.

Figure 3. Thermometric titration curve of an acid number determination, resulting in a single, well-defined exothermic endpoint.

 For more detailed information about this application, download our free Application Bulletin AB-427.

Base number

An appropriate amount of the sample (depending on the expected BN) is weighed directly into the titration vessel, then 1 mL isobutyl vinyl ether and 40 mL toluene are added. After dissolution of the sample, the solution is then titrated with HClO4 in glacial acetic acid to a single endothermic endpoint.

In this situation, the isobutyl vinyl ether serves as the catalytic endpoint indicator. When an excess of HClO4 is present, it will polymerize in a strongly exothermic reaction, resulting in an endothermic endpoint.

Figure 4. Thermometric titration curve of a base number determination, resulting in a single, well-defined endothermic endpoint.

For more detailed information about this application, download our free Application Bulletin AB-405.


Thermometric titration provides a rapid and robust solution for the determination of the acid and base number in comparison to potentiometric or photometric titration. The method solves the issue of sample solubility by using more suitable solvents. Furthermore, less solvent is needed, and the analysis time is reduced. All this results in considerably lower costs per analysis, making it a viable alternative for the acid and base number determination.

Save more money!

Calculate your cost savings with TET here:

Post written by Lucia Meier, Technical Editor at Metrohm International Headquarters, Herisau, Switzerland.